In the September 2006 issue of the Army Magazine, there is an article on the efforts of many people to get the 90th Division finally awarded the Presidential Unit Citation.  It gives the history of everyone's efforts back to the original 1945 request. It is very interesting reading, describing the heroic actions of the members of the 90th Division. Many many hours of work has been done to convince the government that this unit is deserving of the Presidential Unit Citation but,

As of this writing, the award is still denied.

Here is the direct link to the article and the article itself has been posted here for you all to read.

Thank you to General Bell for telling it like it is.

Click here for direct link to article.

 

An Honor Denied

 

By Brig. Gen. Raymond E. Bell Jr., AUS retired

On September 15, 2003, President George W. Bush awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) to the entire 3rd Infantry Division (Mechanized) for its valorous service in toppling the regime of Saddam Hussein. For the gallant defense of the key crossroads in Belgium at the town of Bastogne in the winter of 1944-45, the whole 101st Airborne Division won the Distinguished Unit Citation. (DUC was the predecessor of the PUC.) Perhaps most significant, on July 27, 2001, all the units of the 96th Infantry Division, including its band, were awarded the PUC for the division’s intrepid and arduous combat in the spring of 1945 on the island of Okinawa.

The awarding of the prestigious Presidential/Distinguished Unit Citation to an entire division is relatively unusual. In the past, smaller units, down to battalion and lower level, have been cited for conspicuous action against formidable odds and enemies which led to their receiving the special recognition that the PUC brings.

Almost all of the awarding of the PUC has been done soon after the particular combat has occurred. In the case of the 96th Infantry Division, however, its valiant and heroic action was not recognized until more than 55 years after it happened. Sadly, many of those soldiers who had performed so well and suffered so grievously during that spring combat in 1945 had passed on by the time the citation was approved.

Another World War II infantry division’s quest to be recognized for extraordinary heroism in combat, however, has not been so successful. In the recent past the veterans of the 90th Infantry Division hoped they could join the select group of division members who earned the blue ribbon signifying the PUC.

True, it took a special effort for the 96th Infantry Division to gain its rightful recognition as a fine combat organization and win the right to be accorded the acclamation that comes with the PUC. A similar effort was made on behalf of the 90th Infantry Division, which fought in northwest Europe, counting more days in combat than any other division in Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower’s command. The division suffered more casualties than any other of the former Army Reserve formations of comparable size. But those grim statistics did not trigger recommendation. Rather, it was the bitter and successful battle later in the fall of 1944, when Patton’s soldiers were battering the defenses around the city of Metz in the French province of Lorraine, that precipitated the initial request for awarding the DUC to the entire division, not just to one of its subordinate units.

Picture this. The Third Army had been slugging it out since the beginning of September with the stubborn German defenders of Metz, a city fortress complex that had not been taken by assault in nearly 1,900 years. The weather was miserably cold with rain, fog and intermittent snow turning the ground to mud and causing untold cases of trench foot, this in addition to numerous combat casualties. An unusually cold winter was just about to descend when Patton’s staff finalized plans to surround Metz, capture it and attack across the border into Germany to the Saar River. Both of Patton’s corps were to participate in a classic double envelopment, with the XX Corps under Maj. Gen. Walton H. Walker to attack north of the city in the vicinity of Thionville and Maj. Gen. Manton S. Eddy’s XII Corps attacking south of Metz. Two attacking divisions were to meet well to the east of Metz and bottle up those German soldiers remaining in the city. The attacking division in the north was to be the 90th Infantry Division, which had already been engaged for a time just north of Metz.

There were two special complications in making this grand maneuver. The first was that the Moselle River had to be crossed before the juncture could be accomplished. The second was that there had been very heavy rains in the early part of November when the river crossing was to be made. The two complications joined to become a gigantic challenge to the 90th Infantry Division’s assault across the river. By the night of November 8, the Moselle had risen dramatically, flooding the area to be traversed by attack elements to the width of more than a mile. Not only was the frigid water high, but the current of the flood waters was very swift and treacherous.

If nature was not enough of an obstacle, the Germans had taken extensive measures to make any crossing all the more hazardous. In the 90th Infantry Division sector, the Germans had been ready since September and were well positioned to interdict any river crossing. Where the 90th’s 358th Infantry Regiment was to cross, for example, its 1st Battalion, once it was over the swollen river, had to attack and neutralize Fort Koenigsmacher, an imposing pre-World War I bastion. By 1944, the fort had been reconfigured to contest a crossing of the Moselle from the west. Close by Koenigsmacher was the reactivated French Maginot Line Metrich fort complex with its concrete shielded guns now aimed by the Germans across the river into American lines.

Gen. Eddy, whose XII Corps was to kick off the cross-river assault on November 7, wanted to postpone the river crossing in the hope that the inclement weather would improve. Gen. Patton said “no.”

Then, in the rainy darkness of November 8-9, assault elements of the 359th Infantry Regiment on the left and the 358th Infantry Regiment on the right waded across and stumbled over the marshy ground through clinging mud, sucking muck and high water. Carrying and pulling their assault craft to where they could no longer walk, the weary sodden soldiers struggled into their boats and paddled stealthily across the swift running river. Two battalions of the 357th Infantry Regiment followed their compatriots in engineer-crewed wooden assault boats in the early morning hours.

What could easily have been a disaster—and for a few days later almost was—turned out to be a spectacular success. Before dawn the 90th Infantry Division had eight of its nine infantry battalions over the river with nary a casualty. The German defenders were caught flat-footed. But they did not wait long to react. They had already laid extensive mine fields in the area and there was Fort Koenigsmacher to be taken and the Metrich fortification system to be reduced. All probable river crossing sites had been zeroed in by German artillery, which soon rose to the occasion. The only thing in favor of the Americans was that the German foxholes along the river bank were evacuated because of flooding. (The assault boats actually floated over the mines planted close to the river bank, but when the water receded, the mines quickly became a deadly menace, resulting in much loss of life.)

Daylight on November 9 brought all the horrors of war to bear. Companies A and B of the 358th, followed eventually by Company C, got on top of Fort Koenigsmacher and began throwing grenades and explosives down air vents. But the Germans mortared the American soldiers clinging to the fort’s empty emplacements which previously had been zeroed in. With dwindling supplies and taking heavy casualties, the American attackers refused to give up, beating back three counterattacks in the process. After several days of bitter and seesaw fighting—gasoline and phosphorus grenades were poured down the air vents and touched off with satchel charges—the fort’s defenders surrendered.

To the north, in the 359th Infantry Regiment’s sector, the infantry advanced several kilometers inland before consolidating their gains. The Germans counterattacked. The 25th Panzer Grenadier Division, aided by German sympathizers in the town of Kerling, tried to force the Americans back across the Moselle. Attacking out of Kerling and driving towards the crossroads of Petite Hettange, German armor with infantry on either side was stopped and turned back just 100 yards short of the crossroads. Lt. Col. Robert Booth, the 359th’s 2nd Battalion commander, personally directed the fire of an anti-tank gun knocking out the lead German armored fighting vehicle. The timely arrival of two American tank destroyers and the concentrated fire of 27 battalions of artillery finally made a shambles of the German attack.

Gen. Patton arrived at the site later that day and commented that he had never seen so many dead enemy in one place—bodies lined the road for almost a mile.

While the infantry regiments of the 90th Infantry Division were struggling in the direct face of the enemy, all its other elements were also severely stressed. The German artillery made it impossible to put a pontoon bridge across the Moselle River. Army engineers, crewing assault boats to ferry casualties forward, battled the swift and swirling current. Many boats were lost and several days passed before a ferry could be constructed to transport heavy vehicles across the swollen river.

But flooding persisted, as did the German artillery. Although the weather continued to be overcast and rainy, small liaison aircraft ferried critical items across to the slowly advancing American infantry.

The river crossing involved all elements of the division—including the band, whose members served as stretcher bearers. Medics were constantly under fire as they treated and evacuated wounded under horrifying conditions. Even German prisoners were put to work in resupplying the Americans and evacuating wounded, both German and American. While U.S. artillery fired from concealed positions in the rear, forward observers moved with the infantry and suffered grievously along with the foot soldiers. There was not a division soldier who did not pull his full weight in making what, in Gen. Patton’s estimation, was a classic river crossing. (For years the Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., paid tribute to the planning and execution of the successful but extremely arduous crossing, perhaps the most difficult combat operation to accomplish.)

Once the German counterattack had been thrown back, the 90th Infantry Division struck out towards the Saar River. Ten days later, despite meeting determined and desperate resistance, the reconnaissance troops of the 90th Infantry Division met elements of the 5th Infantry Division, thus completing the surrounding of Metz. It was many days later, however, before the German-occupied forts around the city surrendered to the 5th Infantry Division. By that time, however, the 90th Infantry Division was preparing to cross the Saar River and attack into the strongest part of the Siegfried Line around the German city of Dillingen.

Soon after the crossing, wheels were set in motion to award the entire 90th Infantry Division the Distinguished Unit Citation which entitled all serving members to wear the blue ribbon framed in gold. In a letter from Headquarters XX Corps, dated January 23, 1945, just five weeks after the surrender of Metz, Gen. Walker sent a recommendation for “Award of Unit Citation” through official channels. With several endorsements, it reached European Theater, U.S. Forces, several months later. In a seventh endorsement, Maj. Gen. H.R. Bull, Chief of Staff of the theater command, forwarded the recommendation to the Adjutant General in Washington, D.C.

Three paragraphs of the document, in recommending approval, are pertinent to the award.

 

The War Department disapproved the recommendation stating that citations of divisions are to be made “only under the most unusual and exceptional circumstances.” Nevertheless, in an April 27, 1946 discussion paper prepared by G-1, Maj. Gen. J.M. Bevans, for the Headquarters, U.S. Forces European Theater’s chief of staff, stated: “Gen. Eisenhower had approved [recommendations] only after careful review of the operations on which they were based. It was his opinion that the standards for the award were met.”

In August 1946, in a letter to the Adjutant General in Washington, the G-l section of the European Theater Headquarters reaffirmed its previous recommendation for the award. The letter cited the 90th Infantry Division as well as five other infantry divisions and two armored divisions. None of the other recommended infantry divisions were original Army Reserve formations: two were Regular Army and two were of National Guard origin.

Evidently this letter went nowhere, as did a follow-up letter. Endorsements flew back and forth, but to no avail. But Gen. Walker, famous for his bulldog determination, would not give up. While commanding the Fifth Army in Chicago, Ill., in 1947, he again entered the fray on behalf of the 90th Infantry Division. Of all the divisions in his wartime command the 90th was the only one he had personally recommended for the award. In an 11th endorsement pertaining to the 90th he wrote:

 

Walker went on to cite Gen. Patton’s description of the 90th Infantry Division’s action as making “one of the epic river crossings in history.” Walker closed by urgently recommending approval by the War Department of the now Presidential Unit Citation to the entire division and to its attached units. In a letter to Maj. Gen. James A. Van Fleet two days later he said he had high hopes that “your magnificent division will finally receive the recognition it so richly deserves.” Alas, it did not.

Part of the same correspondence was a memorandum for record concerning the 96th (signed on July 6, 1951, by then Chief of Staff of the Army Gen. J. Lawton Collins) and the “Reopening of Awards of Presidential Unit Citations.” Collins stated in part that Gen. Marshall “thoroughly agreed that it would be inadvisable at this time to cite any additional [Collins’ italics] divisions for World War II performance. Too much time has passed and the adverse morale effect on units not cited would far outweigh the value to be gained from the citation of a number of other divisions.” Obviously more than one division other than the 101st had been accorded the distinction.

Reasoning about adverse morale was naive, even inane; there is not a World War II veteran of an Army division who did not think that his outfit was not the best in the entire Army, and there were many who would gladly bare fists to prove their point.

The 90th Infantry Division veterans, former members of the 90th Army Reserve Command (ARCOM), and their present day associates in the 90th Regional Readiness Command (RRC) did not give up. The 90th RRC sent Maj. Keith Dover from the 46th Historical Detachment to the Army’s Center of Military History in Washington, D.C., in 2002 for a period of active duty. While there, Dover began to assemble the case for another try at winning the PUC for the 90th. To add credence to his efforts he had the example of the 96th Regional Readiness Command (the former 96th ARCOM) in its successful quest for the PUC. The 96th success gave the 90th hope it could be successful again with a retroactive submission.

Sam Johnson, U.S. Representative from Texas, where the 90th RRC originated and where the 90th Division was formed, addressed a letter of recommendation to Lt. Col. Robert L. White Jr., Chief, Military Awards Branch, U.S. Total Army Personnel Command. By this time the 90th ARCOM had been redesignated the 90th Regional Readiness Command (as it was known in World War I) and now carried the 90th Division’s lineage. After citing reasons for his recommendation, he stated that it was his honor and privilege “to recommend this outstanding unit for a long overdue award of the Presidential Unit Citation.”

The letter was included in the incisive packet assembled by Maj. Dover, properly coordinated and historically accurate, and submitted to the board of general officers which would make the recommendation to the Chief of Staff of the Army. The command structure of the 90th RRC and interested persons were hopeful that the submission would be approved. The 90th Division Association was planning its 60th World War II anniversary reunion convention in Washington, D.C., and its members were keeping their fingers crossed. The association newsletter even posed the question, “Will the 90th Division receive the Presidential Unit Citation for valiant performance in World War II?” But the new submission evidently disappeared into the proverbial black hole.

The acting Secretary of the Army in the early fall of 2004 was the Honorable Les Brownlee. He was a captain in Vietnam and aide-de-camp to then Maj. Gen. Orwin Talbott when Talbott commanded the 1st Infantry Division. Talbott, as a young major in 1944, crossed the Moselle as the S-3 of the 359th Infantry Regiment. He ostensibly made an appeal to Brownlee on behalf of the submission. But nothing happened. Asked about the appeal at the World War II memorial in 2004 after addressing the 90th Infantry Division veterans about the submission, Brownlee said he had never seen it. It seemed inconceivable, knowing that he was going to address the 90th Division convention and knowing Gen. Talbott, that he was ignorant of the submission. Could he not have queried the Chief of Staff of the Army, then Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker, as to the status of the recommendation?

But the convention and the day passed without any word. The award became a non-issue, much to the disappointment of veterans, their families and all those involved in the submission process. Maj. Gen. Ron Sholar, then commanding the 90th RRC, when attending the 2004 celebration of the crossing of the Moselle River, stated that he did not know which way to turn or what more could be done.

It is a shame that the battle for the PUC was the one big battle the 90th Infantry Division lost. The division won high accolades for its performance in Patton’s Third Army. The crossing of the Moselle River was not its only moment of glory; it helped the Poles close the Falaise gap at Chambois. The division made crossings of the Moselle River four times. It crossed the Saar River in Germany, fighting its way into the thickest and most heavily fortified part of the Siegfried Line. It conducted the most successful night attack in northwest Europe during the Battle of the Bulge. It cracked the Siegfried Line at Habscheid and raced to the Rhine River. It was instrumental in the discovery of the Reich’s gold reserves in the Merkers mine complex. It took the surrender of the battle-tested German 11th Panzer Division in the last days of the war.

The performance of the division, when competently led, achieved all its objectives. It ranks with the 96th Infantry Division and 101st Airborne Division, both valid winners of the DUC/PUC, as being one of the best U.S. Army divisions that fought in World War II. It is sad, indeed, that in spite of continued recommendations to award the 90th Infantry Division for its heroic action from November 9 to 19, 1944, under the most calamitous of conditions, the division must still face an honor denied.
 


BRIG. GEN. RAYMOND E. Bell JR., AUS Ret., a graduate of the U.S. Military Academy, commanded the 5th Psychological Operations Group and the 220th Military Police Brigade. Also a graduate of the Army War College and the National War College, he holds a doctorate in history from New York University.